Successes and mistakes on Onlyfans

How to be successful on OF in 2025

Navigating Conflict in the OnlyFans Community: A Closer Look at Accountability and Responsibility

/

63 / 100 SEO Score
Navigating Conflict in the OnlyFans Community: A Closer Look at Accountability and Responsibility
flash arrow up SUBSCRIBE ON MY ONLYFANS, CLICK ON ONLYFANS LOGO!

Hello, I’m Rundalya, an OnlyFans model and sexologist. Today, I want to discuss a significant conflict that has recently emerged within our community and encourage everyone involved to reflect on the situation to discern who is at fault. The issue began with Arkadiy, a results analyst, who found himself at the center of the debate due to his work methods, which have raised numerous questions.

On one hand, Arkadiy is genuinely attempting to analyze data and grasp what fans truly enjoy. However, his ability to communicate personally with fans has proven to be lacking. During a discussion about his methods, he chose to ban me instead of engaging in a constructive dialogue, which is a major red flag. If someone is unwilling to accept criticism or engage in conversation, it suggests there may be underlying issues.

On the other hand, the model he was collaborating with failed to provide a comprehensive content plan. This is a common challenge where models struggle with content creation yet still expect positive outcomes. It’s unreasonable to anticipate success without putting in the necessary effort. In this instance, the model also shares some responsibility for the predicament.

Additionally, her husband, who was meant to support her and assist with video editing, did not take the initiative. If they had divided responsibilities in this manner, he should have been actively involved. Consequently, Arkadiy found himself in the position of the “dad,” trying to motivate them to work without the essential backing from both the model and her husband.

When examining the practices of other agencies, many won’t even begin working without a complete content plan. For instance, they often require 16 scripts before starting any project. This raises the question: why wasn’t it established beforehand that everything needed to be prepared prior to commencing work?

As for the chatters, Arkadiy and Alexander, who were supposed to fulfill this role, seemed to be in a dispute over who could perform better, which raises further concerns. If I had chatters like that on my team, I would not hesitate to let them go. However, it’s difficult to determine whether this is the truth or merely a fabrication. It’s possible that both parties are distorting the facts to defend their actions.

In the end, this conflict is convoluted and unlikely to yield any benefits for anyone involved. OnlyFans is a multifaceted business that requires support at every level. Chatters must communicate effectively, identify paying subscribers rather than “freeloaders,” and avoid underpricing. Models need to update their content regularly and collaborate as part of a team.

From my experience, in 90% of cases, the issues arise from the models themselves. They either fail to create content, are too preoccupied, or simply lack motivation. Even when they do produce content, it can often be uninspired and lacking in depth, causing fans to lose interest quickly.

Traffic has always posed challenges. I advise everyone to explore unique sources instead of relying on the usual ones. Arkadiy expressed concerns about traffic, but if he assumed a management role, he should have overseen the entire process, including its setup. Passing the buck and complaining is an immature approach.

In conclusion, this situation teaches us that it’s best to avoid engaging with individuals who only know how to blame each other and shift responsibilities. Someone needed to take full control to clarify who should be held accountable for the results.

Currently, it appears that Arkadiy is merely an analyst who couldn’t initiate any engagement due to insufficient traffic and poor-quality leads, which I can agree with. Even the OnlyTraffic platform has reported low profitability statistics for GG traffic in 2024. The model is in charge, while the traffic is managed by an unknown entity.

This entire situation is both amusing and perplexing. It’s astonishing how, with such an approach, the page managed to reach $68k. I hope this story serves as a valuable lesson for everyone in our community.

What are your thoughts? Who do you believe is responsible for the model’s income losses?

Feel free to reach out: https://linktr.ee/rundalya

Spread the love

Categories:

Tags:


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x